The summit of the 20 richest countries in the world, held in London, it was concluded by decisions welcomed by the markets and much of the press, especially in the West. However, the tones were muted in the following days and, for a closer analysis of the international press, it should be noted that the uncertainties of the crisis remain all. Many commentators observe that probably will have to think both those who were ready to recite the funeral prayer for capitalism, and those who have spoken to shift due to measures taken at the summit. While some observers had spoken in a positive outcome of the summit, believed to recognize a reconciliation between the needs of the Anglo-American and the Franco-German, other measures have

aroused the concern of many, for the lack of clarity on the way, will the 1000 billion dollars pledged to tackle the crisis, and of the identity of those who charge to refinance the International Monetary Fund. Several analysts from developing countries and among them some Arab observers have criticized the decision to revive the IMF, an institution that has often proved incapable of promoting real development, requiring them to recovery plans by high social costs. The Arab countries, in particular, were totally under-represented in this summit. The only present Arab leader, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia - have pointed out some newspapers - the most part as the representative members of the Arab oil that is not the spokesman of Arab societies and their problems. But, as mentioned, nor is it true that this summit establishes the imminent death of capitalism, but rather - many believe - the start of a reorganization of the balances within it, which involves among other things, the rise of new actors on world, first of all China. The question to which, however, still no answer is what will be painful this reorganization, which will be the social costs worldwide related to it, what the risks for democracy, the threat due to possible drifts xenophobic, and dangers of new dramatic conflict.